Diagnosis of verruciform acanthotic vulvar intra-epithelial neoplasia (vaVIN) using CK17, SOX2 and GATA3 immunohistochemistry.

AIMS: Verruciform acanthotic vulvar intra-epithelial neoplasia (vaVIN) is an HPV-independent, p53 wild-type lesion with distinct morphology and documented risk of recurrence and cancer progression. vaVIN is rare, and prospective distinction from non-neoplastic hyperplastic lesions can be difficult. CK17, SOX2 and GATA3 immunohistochemistry has emerging value in the diagnosis of HPV-independent lesions, particularly differentiated VIN. We aimed to test the combined value of these markers in the diagnosis of vaVIN versus its non-neoplastic differentials in the vulva. METHODS AND RESULTS: CK17, SOX2 and GATA3 immunohistochemistry was evaluated on 16 vaVINs and 34 mimickers (verruciform xanthoma, lichen simplex chronicus, lichen sclerosus, psoriasis, pseudo-epitheliomatous hyperplasia). CK17 was scored as 3+ = full-thickness, 2+ = partial-thickness, 1+ = patchy, 0 = absent; SOX2 as 3+ = strong staining ≥ 10% cells, 2+ = moderate, 1 + =weak, 0 = staining in < 10% cells; and GATA3 as pattern 0 = loss in < 25% basal cells, 1 = loss in 25-75% basal cells, 2 = loss in > 75% basal cells. For analysis, results were recorded as positive (CK17 = 3+, SOX2 = 3+, GATA3 = patterns 1/2) or negative (CK17 = 2+/1+/0, SOX2 = 2+/1+/0, GATA3 = pattern 0). CK17, SOX2 and GATA3 positivity was documented in 81, 75 and 58% vaVINs, respectively, versus 32, 17 and 22% of non-neoplastic mimickers, respectively; ≥ 2 marker positivity conferred 83 sensitivity, 88 specificity and 86% accuracy in vaVIN diagnosis. Compared to vaVIN, SOX2 and GATA3 were differentially expressed in lichen sclerosus, lichen simplex chronicus and pseudo-epitheliomatous hyperplasia, whereas CK17 was differentially expressed in verruciform xanthoma and adjacent normal mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: CK17, SOX2 and GATA3 can be useful in the diagnosis of vaVIN and its distinction from hyperplastic non-neoplastic vulvar lesions. Although CK17 has higher sensitivity, SOX2 and GATA3 are more specific, and the combination of all markers shows optimal diagnostic accuracy.

Trichorhinophalangeal Syndrome Type 1 Is a Highly Sensitive and Specific Marker for Diagnosing Triple-Negative Breast Carcinomas on Cytologic Samples.

CONTEXT.­: Definitive diagnosis of metastatic triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) is challenging on cytologic samples. Recent studies demonstrated that trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) is a highly sensitive and specific marker for diagnosing breast carcinomas, including TNBC, on surgical specimens. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate TRPS1 expression in TNBCs on cytologic samples and a large series of nonbreast tumors on tissue microarray sections. DESIGN.­: Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of TRPS1 and GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) was performed on 35 TNBC cases on surgical specimens, and 29 consecutive TNBC cases on cytologic specimens. IHC analysis of TRPS1 expression was also performed on 1079 nonbreast tumors on tissue microarray sections. RESULTS.­: Of the surgical specimens, 35 of 35 TNBC cases (100%) were positive for TRPS1, all with diffuse positivity, whereas 27 of 35 (77%) were positive for GATA3, with diffuse positivity in 7 cases (26%). Of the cytologic samples, 27 of 29 TNBC cases (93%) were positive for TRPS1, with diffuse positivity in 20 cases (74%), whereas 12 of 29 (41%) were positive for GATA3, with diffuse positivity in 2 cases (17%). Of the nonbreast malignant tumors, TRPS1 expression was seen in 9.4% (3 of 32) of melanomas, 10.7% (3 of 28) of small cell carcinomas of the bladder, and 9.7% (4 of 41) of ovarian serous carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS.­: Our data confirm that TRPS1 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for diagnosing TNBC cases on surgical specimens as reported in the literature. In addition, these data demonstrate that TRPS1 is a much more sensitive marker than GATA3 in detecting metastatic TNBC cases on cytologic samples. Therefore, inclusion of TRPS1 in the diagnostic IHC panel is recommended when a metastatic TNBC is suspected.

Immunohistochemical expression of renin and GATA3 help distinguish juxtaglomerular cell tumors from renal glomus tumors.

Juxtaglomerular cell tumors and glomus tumors both arise from perivascular mesenchymal cells. Juxtaglomerular cells are specialized renin-secreting myoendocrine cells in the afferent arterioles adjacent to glomeruli, and juxtaglomerular tumors derived from these cells are therefore unique to the kidney. In contrast, glomus tumors have been described at numerous anatomic sites and may show significant morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap with juxtaglomerular tumors when occurring in the kidney. Although ultrastructural studies and immunohistochemistry for renin may distinguish these entities, these diagnostic modalities are often unavailable in routine clinical practice. Herein, we studied the clinicopathologic features of a large series of juxtaglomerular tumors (n = 15) and glomus tumors of the kidney (n = 9) to identify features helpful in their separation, including immunohistochemistry for smooth muscle actin (SMA), CD34, collagen IV, CD117, GATA3, synaptophysin, and renin. Markers such as SMA (juxtaglomerular tumors: 12/13, 92%; glomus tumors: 9/9, 100%), CD34 (juxtaglomerular tumors: 14/14, 100%; glomus tumors: 7/9, 78%), and collagen IV (juxtaglomerular tumors: 5/6, 83%; glomus tumors: 3/3, 100%) were not helpful in separating these entities. In contrast to prior reports, all juxtaglomerular tumors were CD117 negative (0/12, 0%), as were glomus tumors (0/5, 0%). Our results show that juxtaglomerular tumors have a younger age at presentation (median age: 27 years), female predilection, and frequently exhibit diffuse positivity for renin (10/10, 100%) and GATA3 (7/9, 78%), in contrast to glomus tumors (median age: 51 years; renin: 0/6, 0%; GATA3: 0/6, 0%). These findings may be helpful in distinguishing these tumors when they exhibit significant morphologic overlap.

Role of GATA3 in tumor diagnosis: A review.

GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) belongs to a family of transcription factors comprising six members. These proteins identify G-A-T-A containing sequences in the target gene and bind to DNA target via two zinc-finger domains. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of GATA3 in the diagnosis of tumors and its value as a prognostic marker. To perform this review, a comprehensive search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases from 1985 to 2020. Articles were considered thoroughly by independent reviewers and data were extracted in predefined forms. Final synthesis was conducted by using appropriate data from included articles in each topic. Studies have shown that GATA3 has a critical role in the development of epithelial structures in both embryonic and adult tissues. The majority of studies regarding GATA3 expression in tumor evaluation focused on breast and urothelial neoplasms, whether primary or metastatic. Its sensitivity in these neoplasms has been reported to be high and made this marker more valuable than other available immunohistochemistry markers. However, GATA3 expression was not restricted to these tumors. Studies have shown that GATA3 immunostaining could be a useful tool in various tumors in kidney, salivary gland, endocrine system, hematopoietic system, and skin. GATA3 can also be used as a useful prognostic tool. Although GATA3 is a multi-specific immunohistochemical stain, it is a valuable marker in the panel for confirming many epithelial or mesenchymal neoplasms as both a diagnostic and prognostic tool.

Wnt Family Member 9b (Wnt9b) Is a New Sensitive and Specific Marker for Breast Cancer.

Confirming the tumor origin is often a diagnostic challenge in pathology and carries significant therapeutic impacts. Cytokeratin 7, estrogen receptor, and GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) are well-established diagnostic markers frequently used to support a tumor's breast origin. However, their specificities still have room to improve. Many nonbreast tumors express cytokeratin 7 and estrogen receptor, and urothelial tumors frequently express GATA3. There is a practical need for a new breast lineage marker that is sensitive and specific. Wnt family member proteins play critical roles in embryo development, tissue homeostasis and tumor development through ß-catenin dependent and independent pathways. The current study evaluated Wnt9b and GATA3 expression in 163 primary breast cancers, 63 metastatic breast cancers, and 525 nonbreast epithelial tumors. The positive rates of Wnt9b and GATA3 in primary breast cancer were both 98.7%. The positive rates in metastatic breast cancer were 87.3% for Wnt9b and 96.8% for GATA3. For nonbreast tumors, including 64 cases of urothelial carcinoma, Wnt9b was negative in all except salivary gland carcinomas. The study demonstrated that Wnt9b is a breast cancer marker with similar sensitivity as GATA3 but with greater specificity than GATA3 and may ultimately become a useful diagnostic tool in routine surgical pathology practice.

Association of current molecular subtypes in urothelial carcinoma with patterns of muscularis propria invasion.

Urothelial carcinoma is subdivided into luminal (L), basal (B), and p53-wild-type (WT) molecular subtypes, with basal and p53-WT groups showing more aggressive course and poor treatment response, respectively. The literature on molecular subtypes of UC includes a mixture of different stages. We investigated the molecular profile and outcome of pure cohort of muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC) considering two distinct patterns of muscularis propria (MP) invasion. Forty-three cystectomies harboring stage pT2 were retrospectively identified in 18 years. MP invasion was subclassified into patterns 1 (tumor encasing intact detrusor muscle bundles) and 2 (tumor dissecting/replacing detrusor muscle). Using IHC, B/L phenotypes, p53, and Ki67 were assessed, and survival data was collected. Pattern 1 invasion was noted in 16 (37%) and pattern 2 in 27 (63%), with mean age of pattern 1 being 10 years younger. B/L phenotypes were successfully determined in 83.7%; 48.8% and 34.8% revealed L and B phenotypes, respectively (indeterminate phenotype in 16.4%). Pattern 1 was associated with L phenotype (GATA3 and HER-2 expressions: p = 0.02 & p = 0.04, respectively). Ki67 ≥ 5/10HPF was noted in pattern 2 and B phenotype (p = 0.03). B phenotype showed association with p53-WT (p = 0.007). In median follow-up of 60.7 months, 63.6% of pattern 1 cases were alive without disease compared to 32% of pattern 2 (not significant). A panel of CK20 and GATA3 for luminal and CK5/6 and CK14 for basal subtypes can provide reliable molecular classification in UC. Also, morphology of MIBC can predict the molecular phenotype and the behavior of the UC.

Acinic Cell Carcinoma of the Breast: Report of a Case With Immunohistochemical and Next-Generation Sequencing Studies.

Acinic cell carcinoma of the breast is a rare subtype of triple-negative breast cancer that recapitulates the appearance of tumors seen in salivary glands. We present the case of a 42-year-old woman with an irregular, nontender mass above the left nipple during routine obstetric appointment at 24 weeks gestation. She was subsequently diagnosed with triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast, Nottingham grade 3, via core needle biopsy. She was treated with neoadjuvant therapy (doxorubucin and cyclophosphamide) antenatally and paclitaxel in the postpartum period followed by left mastectomy with sentinel node biopsy. The carcinoma in the mastectomy specimen showed a spectrum of morphologic patterns with immunohistochemistry revealing strong positivity for alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), lysozyme, and S100. The histomorphology paired with the immunoprofile led us to the diagnosis of acinic cell carcinoma. We retrospectively performed immunostains in the core biopsy specimen, which demonstrated GATA-3 and DOG-1 positivity. Next-generation sequencing of the postneoadjuvant specimen using a 70-gene panel revealed 2 single-nucleotide variant (SNV) mutations: tumor protein 53 (TP53) (c.747G>T) SNV mutation and rearranged during transfection (RET) (c.2899G>A) SNV mutation.

Malignant phyllodes tumour of the breast mimicking endometriosis.

A 63-year-old woman presented with a clinically malignant mass. Core biopsy showed features resembling endometriosis. The glands were GATA3 and oestrogen receptor positive consistent with mammary origin and had no myoepithelial layer. The excision also showed a fibroepithelial component with stromal overgrowth, frequent mitoses and invasive margin consistent with a malignant phyllodes tumour. KMT2D and SETD2 mutations were present in both the conventional phyllodes tumour and endometriosis-like areas and are also described in endometriosis raising interesting questions about these lesions. This unusual pattern is a potential diagnostic pitfall, so it is helpful to be aware of it.

Cytokeratin 7, GATA3, and SOX-10 is a Comprehensive Panel in Diagnosing Triple Negative Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

Following lung cancer, breast cancer is the second most common metastatic tumor to the brain, of which triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ (HER2+) breast cancer are the most common subtypes. TNBC does not have standard immunoprofiles and can be difficult to distinguish from other metastases. A tissue microarray was created from 47 patients with breast cancer metastases to the brain and 12 paired breast primaries. Of 47 breast cancer metastases, 24 were HER2+, 14 were TNBC, and 9 were luminal. Forty-five were cytokeratin 7 (CK7) positive, 36 were GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) positive, 7 were Sry-related HMg-Box gene 10 (SOX-10) positive, 20 were mammaglobin positive, and 19 were gross cystic disease fluid protein 15 positive. At least one of the CK7, GATA3, or SOX-10 was positive in all TNBC metastases. A panel of CK7, GATA3, and SOX-10 is complementary in the diagnosis of breast cancer brain metastasis. SOX-10 appears to be a specific but not particularly sensitive marker in this context.

Is immunohistochemical expression of GATA3 helpful in the differential diagnosis of transformed mycosis fungoides and primary cutaneous CD30-positive T cell lymphoproliferative disorders?

Mycosis fungoides with large cell transformation (MFLCT) can be difficult to distinguish from primary cutaneous CD30+ T cell lymphoproliferative disorders (PC CD30+ LPD), especially primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (PC-ALCL). This diagnostic distinction is critical for appropriate patient management. GATA3 has been proposed to be useful in the discrimination between these two entities. We identified 25 cases of MFLCT and 24 cases of PC CD30+ LPDs (including lymphomatoid papulosis (n=14), PC-ALCL (n=6), and CD30+ LPD, not otherwise specified (n=4)) diagnosed at our institution from 2002 to 2019. Sections from archived specimens were stained to evaluate for GATA3 expression by immunohistochemistry and compared among cutaneous CD30+ T cell LPDs. The majority of the MFLCT cohort had strong, diffuse expression of GATA3 ranging from 0 to 100% of dermal T cells (mean 53.20%) with 15/25 cases (60%) showing GATA3 expression greater than 50%, while the PC CD30+ LPD group showed variable, moderate GATA3 labeling ranging from 0 to 60% of dermal T cells (mean 23.26%), with 5/6 cases (83%) showing GATA3 expression less than 40% (p =0.003). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 56% and 74%, while positive and negative predictive values were 70% and 61%, respectively. Based on the percent staining of positive cells, using 50% as a cutoff value for expression, GATA3 might be a useful immunohistochemical marker to discriminate MFLCT from PC CD30+ LPDs, including PC-ALCL.

Endosalpingiosis Is Negative for GATA3.

CONTEXT.­: Endosalpingiosis is a benign Müllerian inclusion that can mimic metastatic low-grade mammary carcinoma, particularly when encountered in axillary lymph nodes excised for breast cancer staging. Immunohistochemistry can be useful in histologically ambiguous cases, and a targeted immunopanel should include a marker of gynecologic tract origin and a marker of mammary origin. GATA3 is a sensitive immunomarker for breast carcinoma, but the immunoreactivity of GATA3 in endosalpingiosis has not been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVE.­: To evaluate whether GATA3 immunohistochemistry could be used to differentiate endosalpingiosis from metastatic mammary carcinoma. DESIGN.­: Whole slide sections of 15 cases of endosalpingiosis involving nonneoplastic tissues were subjected to GATA3 immunohistochemistry. Nuclear GATA3 labeling was scored as percentage and intensity labeling, with any labeling considered positive; GATA3 labeling was recorded in all cells present in the sections. RESULTS.­: Half (47%, n = 7 of 15) of the endosalpingiosis cases involved lymph nodes (2 axillary, 5 pelvic) and half (53%, n = 8 of 15) involved pelvic organs or soft tissue (3 myometrial, 2 paratubal, 2 periadnexal soft tissue, and 1 pelvic sidewall). GATA3 immunohistochemistry was negative in all cases of endosalpingiosis, with intact, positive control labeling in lymphocytes. The benign fallopian tube epithelium present on the sections of paratubal endosalpingiosis displayed focal (<5%), weak labeling for GATA3, specifically within the ciliated and secretory cells. CONCLUSIONS.­: These findings support the diagnostic utility of GATA3 immunohistochemistry and its use in a targeted immunopanel to resolve the differential diagnosis of metastatic low-grade mammary carcinoma (GATA3+) and nodal endosalpingiosis (GATA3-).

GATA3 is a useful immunohistochemical marker for distinguishing sarcomatoid malignant mesothelioma from lung sarcomatoid carcinoma and organizing pleuritis.

Sarcomatoid malignant mesothelioma (SMM) tends to occur in the pleura and is morphologically similar to lung sarcomatoid carcinoma (LSC) and organizing pleuritis (OP). Because SMM often does not express mesothelial markers, it is very difficult to distinguish from LSC and OP. GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3) is a specific immunohistochemical (IHC) marker of breast and urothelial carcinoma. We routinely find that GATA is expressed in MM; however, GATA3 expression in SMM and its reference value for distinguishing SMM from LSC and OP remain unclear. Here, we used IHC methods to detect the expression of GATA3 and classic mesothelial markers in 17 SMM, 12 LSC, and 7 OP cases. We detected the following expression rates in SMM versus LSC cases: GATA3 (70.6% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.008), calretinin (52.9% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.019), Wilms tumor (WT)-1 (64.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.000), D2-40 (47.1% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.126), CK5/6 (35.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.694), and pan-cytokeratin (CKpan) (88.2% vs. 100.0%, p = 0.498). The specificities of calretinin, WT-1, and GATA3 in distinguishing SMM from LSC were 91.7%, 100%, and 83.3%, respectively, and combinations of any two of these three markers exhibited 100% specificity for SMM. Notably, the sensitivity of calretinin+/WT1+ staining for SMM was only 23.5%, which increased to 64.7% after including GATA3. Furthermore, all OP cases showed partial or diffuse expression of CKpan, WT-1, and D2-40 but no GATA3 and calretinin expression. In conclusion, GATA3 is an IHC marker with excellent sensitivity and specificity for SMM, and the combined consideration of GATA3, calretinin, and WT-1 was best for distinguishing SMM from LSC. Moreover, CKpan, WT-1, and D2-40 had no value for distinguishing SMM from OP, and GATA3 and calretinin were the most specific markers for distinguishing these two lesions.

Triple-marker immunohistochemical assessment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Is there prognostic significance?

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is the ninth most common cancer worldwide, and the third most common cancer in Lebanon. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been used to stratify muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) into different subtypes. However, to our knowledge, there exists no study that investigates the use of this low-cost technique to predict prognosis in bladder cancer patients in our region. AIM: To examine the feasibility of low-cost triple-marker IHC assessment for MIBC subtyping in order to predict patients' survival and cisplatin sensitivity. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected the specimens of deceased patients diagnosed with MIBC on pathology at our institution. For each case, tumor tissue blocks were retrieved and stained for hematoxylin and eosin in addition to three molecular markers by IHC: cytokeratin 5/6, cytokeratin 14 staining basal BC, and GATA3 staining luminal BC. A cut-off of ≥20% was set as positive. Kaplan-Meier curves were built, factored by BC subtype, to predict overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios in Cox regression were also created accounting for oncological factors and BC subtype. We categorized specimens as either luminal (GATA3 positive only) (n = 21; 56.7%) or as double-positive (GATA3 and basal cytokeratin 5/6 or cytokeratin 14 positive) (n = 16; 43.3%). The overall median survival was similar between the two categories (27.0 ± 4.82 months). Numbers favored luminal disease for PFS (Breslow P = .032). After adjusting for covariates, luminal molecular expression predicted PFS (0.28; [0.09-0.94]). Yet, the Cox model was not able to identify any predictors of OS or DSS. CONCLUSION: Specimens enriched with only a luminal molecular profile were more likely to exhibit cisplatin sensitivity. Despite the absence of guidelines recommending the utilization of molecular profiling in clinic practice, triple-marker IHC could serve as a potential low-cost prognostic indicator to identify patients at high risk of progression.

Atypical BCL6/GATA3+ Primary Cutaneous Acral CD8-Positive T-Cell Lymphoma: A Diagnostic Challenge.

ABSTRACT: Primary cutaneous acral CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma consists of slow-growing nodules in acral sites with a histopathology, suggesting high-grade lymphoma despite the indolent clinical course. It has been recently included in WHO-EORTC classification for primary cutaneous lymphomas as a provisional entity. A correct diagnosis of this entity is important because its differential diagnosis include more aggressive cutaneous lymphomas. We present a 53-year-old woman with an indolent solitary nodule on her right leg, which histopathologically showed features of CD8-positive T-cell lymphoma, although with some peculiarities, including epidermotropism, absence of CD68 expression, and positivity for GATA3 and Bcl6 in neoplastic cells. This case could contribute to better define the spectrum of this rare cutaneous lymphoma.

Novel uses of immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: interpretation and pitfalls.

Immunohistochemistry is an essential component of diagnostic breast pathology. The emergence of novel assays and applications is accompanied by new interpretation criteria and potential pitfalls. Immunohistochemistry assists in supporting breast origin for primary or metastatic carcinomas and identifying non-mammary metastases to the breast; however, no single immunostain is perfectly sensitive nor specific. GATA3 and Sox10 are particularly useful immunostains to identify triple negative breast carcinoma, which are often negative for other markers of mammary differentiation. Sox10 labeling is a major potential diagnostic pitfall, as Sox10 and S-100 label both triple negative breast carcinoma and metastatic melanoma; a pan-cytokeratin immunostain should always be included for this differential diagnosis. Novel immunohistochemistry serves as surrogates for the molecular alterations unique to several of special-type breast carcinomas, including the use of MYB in adenoid cystic carcinoma, pan-TRK in secretory carcinoma, and mutant IDH2 in tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity (TCCRP). In addition, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is an emerging, albeit imperfect, biomarker for breast cancer immunotherapy, with different assay parameters and scoring criteria in breast carcinoma compared to other tumor types. The expanding repertoire of novel immunohistochemistry provides additional diagnostic tools and biomarkers that improve diagnostic breast pathology and patient care.

TRPS1: a highly sensitive and specific marker for breast carcinoma, especially for triple-negative breast cancer.

Currently there is no highly specific and sensitive marker to identify breast cancer-the most common malignancy in women. Breast cancer can be categorized as estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-positive luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) types based on the expression of ER, PR, and HER2. Although GATA3 is the most widely used tumor marker at present to determine the breast origin, which has been shown to be an excellent marker for ER-positive and low-grade breast cancer, but it does not work well for TNBC with sensitivity as low as <20% in metaplastic breast carcinoma. In the current study, through TCGA data mining we identified trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1 (TRPS1) as a specific gene for breast carcinoma across 31 solid tumor types. Moreover, high mRNA level of TRPS1 was found in all four subtypes of breast carcinoma including ER/PR-positive luminal A and B types, HER2-positive type, and basal-type/TNBC. We then analyzed TRPS1 expression in 479 cases of various types of breast cancer using immunochemistry staining, and found that TRPS1 and GATA3 had comparable positive expression in ER-positive (98% vs. 95%) and HER2-positive (87% vs. 88%) breast carcinomas. However, TRPS1 which was highly expressed in TNBC, was significantly higher than GATA3 expression in metaplastic (86% vs. 21%) and nonmetaplastic (86% vs. 51%) TNBC. In addition, TRPS1 expression was evaluated in 1234 cases of solid tumor from different organs. In contrast to the high expression of GATA3 in urothelial carcinoma, TRPS1 showed no or little expression in urothelial carcinomas or in other tumor types including lung adenocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, colon and gastric adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and ovarian carcinoma. These findings suggest that TRPS1 is a highly sensitive and specific marker for breast carcinoma and can be used as a great diagnostic tool, especially for TNBC.

Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity and its renal papillary adenoma analogue.

AIMS: Papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRNRP) is a newly defined entity with distinct histomorphology and recurrent KRAS mutation. It has been estimated to constitute 4% of previously diagnosed papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). Renal papillary adenoma (PA) is suggested to be the precursor of PRCC. This study aimed to investigate the association between PRNRP and PA, particularly the morphologically similar type D PA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nephrectomy specimens of PRCC and PA from our 10-year pathology archives were retrieved and reviewed. GATA3 immunohistochemistry and RAS/BRAF testing were performed in all cases reclassified as PRNRP and all PAs with sufficient materials. Overall, PRNRP accounted for 9.1% (10 of 110) of PRCC and there was no recurrence/metastasis with a mean follow-up period of 39 months. Three novel morphological features were described, including clear cell change, mast cell infiltration and metaplastic ossification. Nine of the 10 PRNRPs showed diffuse and strong GATA3 expression and KRAS missense mutations at codon 12. One case exhibited moderate GATA3 staining on 80% of the tumour cells and RAS/BRAF wild-type. In a total of 73 PAs, 11 were classified as type D. GATA3 expression was significantly more frequent in type D versus non-type D PAs (100 versus 35%, P < 0.01). KRAS missense mutations were identified in six of eight (75%) of the type D PAs but none of the 18 non-type D PAs. CONCLUSIONS: Type D PA was different from other types of PA and represented an analogue or a small-sized PRNRP for their identical morphology, immunophenotype and molecular signature.

Molecular and immunohistochemical evaluation of BAP-1 antibody in bladder cancer and comparison with luminal-basal subtyping.

AIM: Molecular subtyping has become increasingly important in bladder cancer, and it is mainly divided into "luminal" and "basal" types. Despite the large amount of studies about the molecular pathway of bladder cancer, there are few studies about BAP-1. The aim of this study is to evaluate the BAP-1 expression molecularly and immunohistochemically and compare it with GATA-3 and CK5/6 immunohistochemical stains. MATERIALS AND METHOD: A BAP-1 antibody was applied by western blotting to the tumor and normal tissues of 11 patients with known primary bladder tumors. The paraffin blocks of 150 non-invasive and 150 invasive tumor tissues were selected from transurethral resection materials. BAP-1, GATA-3, and CK5/6 immunohistochemical stains were applied to them, and the results were evaluated. RESULTS: The protein expression levels of BAP-1 increased more in the tumor tissues compared to the normal tissues. The immunohistochemical BAP-1 expression was strong in the muscle-invasive group. The immunohistochemical GATA-3 expression was higher in the non-invasive group, and the CK5/6 expression was higher in the muscle-invasive group. The GATA-3 and CK5/6 immunohistochemical stains had a negative correlation in the muscle-invasive group. The immunohistochemical expression of BAP-1 had no correlation with GATA-3 and CK5/6 in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular subtyping has become increasingly important in bladder cancer and it is mainly divided into "luminal" and "basal" type. Despite the large amount of studies about molecular pathway of the bladder cancer, there are a few studies about BAP-1. The aim of this study is to evaluate the BAP-1 expression molecularly and immunohistochemically and compare it with GATA-3 and CK5/6 immunohistochemical stains.

Aberrant GATA3 Staining in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall.

Distinguishing between poorly differentiated urothelial carcinoma and high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma is a common challenge in genitourinary pathology, particularly when the tumor involves the bladder neck or prostatic urethra. Clinically, the distinction between these 2 tumors can also be difficult. Proper diagnosis in these patients is essential as they have differing prognoses and clinical management. GATA3 is thought to be a sensitive and relatively specific marker of urothelial carcinoma. However, there is scant data regarding GATA3 labeling of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study is to describe rare cases with strong aberrant GATA3 staining in prostatic adenocarcinoma as a potential diagnostic pitfall. We identified 9 cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma with aberrant positive GATA3 staining from 2015 to 2020 as part of a large consultation service at our institution. All 9 cases were grade group 5, 8 had a Gleason score of 5+5=10 and 1 had a score of 4+5=9. Five of the cases were from the prostate, 3 from the urinary bladder, and 1 from the prostatic urethra. All cases were morphologically typical of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma, although were sent for consultation due to uncertainty in the diagnosis. GATA3 positivity was strong, diffuse in 4 cases; strong, patchy in 2 cases and strong, focal in 3 cases. All cases were positive for NKX3.1, 6 positive for p501s, and 6 positive for PSA, with 7/9 cases showing expression of at least 2 prostate-specific markers. The current study describes that rare cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma can show focal or diffuse strong staining for GATA3. In order to avoid this diagnostic pitfall, undifferentiated carcinomas involving the prostate, bladder neck, or trigone should be evaluated not only with GATA3 but also prostate-specific markers.